|
![]() ![]() Making coffins for the victims on the corner of Hobart Street
THE terrible tragedy of a horrific mine disaster is remembered at Mary Ann Jones was no novice when it came to mining explosions. She had seen it all before, although nothing on the scale that confronted her on that fateful Autumn day in 1887. Mary became somewhat of a celebrity after she decided to take on the might of the region痴 largest employer in the wake of the tragedy. Her courageous battle for compensation and outspoken criticism of the mine management won her respect and admiration from all quarters of the community after the explosion that rocked Bulli at Accidents in the dark depths of the coal pits were unfortunately part and parcel of mine work and Mary Jones had seen it all before. She had in the past helped bury mining accident victims in her motherland When confusion and grief took hold as mangled bodies began to surface from the pit portal, most women folk, who had lost husbands and sons, were in no fit state to prepare the victims for burial. Mine manager Alexander Ross asked Mary to receive the victims, wash, shroud, and prepare them for the grave, and, as she later revealed, to spare no expense. She accepted the commission and did as Ross requested, working with two other women for three days preparing the dead. ![]()
典he remains are in some cases burned to a cinder, it was reported. 典he heads are smashed in, the arms and legs broken, and fearful gashes appear on the bodies. The clothes in some cases are burned to ashes. The hair is singed from heads and faces and the flesh roasted and shrivelled. Mary (left) received the 81 men and boys in the coal company's work shed, located on the present corner of Eighty men were employed to dig graves at
"To the Directors of the Bulli Colliery Company - I have waited some time to see if you thought it necessary to recognise my services which I rendered in connection with the unfortunate men in the late explosion on - Yours respectfully, Mrs MA Jones." ![]()
Controversy erupted when Ross (left) rejected Mary痴 claims of payment and denied he had used the words "spare no expense", saying she did the duty out of kindness. The events came to a head in April 1888 when Mary summoned the Bulli Colliery to the Sydney District Court in an endeavour to recover 」20 and 5 shillings for "work done and services rendered" as a result of the Bulli disaster. It was a case that immediately sparked intense interest and attracted great media attention. Such a ghastly case had never before been heard in an Australian court. Ross told the court that he may have made the remark "spare no expense" to have the bodies decently prepared for burial around the many people gathered around the pit mouth, but denied saying it directly to Mary.
The Honourable Judge Murray came to the conclusion that although both parties believed they were speaking the truth, Mary痴 evidence was so positive and so consistent with common justice that the 砺erdict be awarded to the plaintiff. Mary Ann Jones was granted her 」20 and 5shillings for services, plus court costs. The community are invited to the annual Bulli Mine Disaster service, hosted by the Black Diamond Heritage Centre, at
For a full list of stories and a short review click on |
|
|